The History of Marijuana-a brief Video Created by Weeds
Here is short two minute a video created by the hit Showtime show Weeds. This video shows a brief description of history of cannabis. It shows where cannabis began and how it was used throughout history and how our historic ancestors used marijuana.

What is Weeds?
Weeds is an American television dark comedy-drama series created by Jenji Kohan and produced by Lionsgate Television, which began airing on the Showtime cable television network in 2005. The show revolves around Nancy Botwin (Mary-Louise Parker), a widowed suburbanite mother of two boys—eldest Silas (Hunter Parish) and Shane (Alexander Gould)—who turned to selling marijuana to support her family after her husband unexpectedly died. Over the course of the show, Nancy becomes involved in illegal activities on an escalating scale; the first three seasons deal mainly with selling and growing marijuana locally, while seasons four and after finds the Botwin family through constant resettlements within the Pacific coastal lines of the United States due to multiple circumstances that arise.
Our Goal Is To Offer A Safe And Easy Way For You To Obtain Your Medical Cannabis. Here Are Just A Few Of The Areas We deliver Medical Marijuana To: Riverside County, inland empire, San Diego, Wildomar, Lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, hemet, pala, fallbrook, redlands, sedco hills, homeland, san jacinto, woodcrest And All The Cities Listed In Areas 1, 2, 3. Our Delivery Of Your Medcial Marijuana Will Always Be On Time, Reliable And Discreet.Fox News On Prop. 19 - Marijuana Legalization
September 29, 2010 by admin
Filed under Important Information, Pictures
The California Beer & Beverage Distributors (CBBD)
has donated $10-thousand to defeat Proposition 19
(legalize recreational pot use and cultivation for adults 21 and over)
The alcohol trade group says if Prop. 19 passes, employers would be prevented from drug testing their workers for weed. In a statement, the CBBD said “this would allow California beer distributors’ drivers to operate hundreds of big rig trucks and trailers, sales vehicles and trucks on California highways every day, exposing the motoring public to potential harm. It is also the CBBD’s concern that with the doing away with drug testing of employees, our transportation businesses may be unable to find liability insurance to insure our companies.”
Those supporting legalization argue getting high is far less dangerous than getting drunk. Government figures show that in 2008, nearly 12,000 people were killed in drunk driving accidents. While many authorities firmly believe smoking pot impairs driving, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration does not keep statistics on how many accidents were caused by stoned drivers. Pro-pot advocates argue that that is because the number is so small.
The “Yes on 19″ campaign suggests California beer sellers are only worried about protecting their turf. “There’s a history of alcohol companies putting money against propositions such as ours, and frankly, it could be they’re concerned about the competition,” says Dale Sky Jones, the campaign’s spokeswoman.
While the CBBD denies its contribution anything to do with competition, several breweries, including popular Chico-based Sierra Nevada, are furious because they’ve been linked with Prop. 19 opposition, and have asked the CBBD to remove their name from their membership list.

“This is California, and every fight has a fight, in a fight, in a fight,” says Phil Matier, political columnist with the San Francisco Chronicle.
“Now you’ve got brew vs. brew, where you have some of the distributors saying, ‘okay, we’re against it,’ and some of the independent breweries like Sierra Nevada saying, ‘No! We don’t want to be associated with this, we’re neutral on the issue, and we’ll let our customers decide.’”
Voters are split, too. A new Field Poll has the measure passing, 49% to 42%, with a 4.1% margin of error. Analysts say alcohol groups, law enforcement organizations, most politicians, and others opposed to Prop. 19 will need to spend more and do more to persuade voters that legalizing pot will create a greater public safety threat, than keeping it illegal.

Our Goal Is To Offer A Safe And Easy Way For You To Obtain Your Medical Cannabis. Here Are Just A Few Of The Areas We deliver Medical Marijuana To: Riverside County, inland empire, San Diego, Wildomar, Lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, hemet, pala, fallbrook, redlands, sedco hills, homeland, san jacinto, woodcrest And All The Cities Listed In Areas 1, 2, 3. Our Delivery Of Your Medcial Marijuana Will Always Be On Time, Reliable And Discreet.
Marijuana: Inspiring successful Americans since 1776.
Click to Order These Posters
Our Goal Is To Offer A Safe And Easy Way For You To Obtain Your Medical Cannabis. Here Are Just A Few Of The Areas We deliver Medical Marijuana To: Riverside County, inland empire, San Diego, Wildomar, Lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, hemet, pala, fallbrook, redlands, sedco hills, homeland, san jacinto, woodcrest And All The Cities Listed In Areas 1, 2, 3. Our Delivery Of Your Medcial Marijuana Will Always Be On Time, Reliable And Discreet.
The Flower Video
“The Flower” is a great analogy of our society’s relationship with marijuana, through the prism of an alternate reality. It’s no wonder this video is spreading quickly across the internet, it is a clear look at the damages and dangers of prohibition
Our goal is to offer a safe and easy way for you to obtain your Medical Cannabis. Here are just a few of the areas we offer Medical Marijuana delivery to: Riverside County, San Diego, Wildomar, lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, and all the cities listed in Areas 1, 2, 3. Our delivery of your medcial marijuana will always be on time, reliable and discreet.
About Proposition 19
September 26, 2010 by admin
Filed under Important Information
The Problem
Today, hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are wasted enforcing the failed prohibition of cannabis (also known as marijuana). Currently, cannabis is easier for kids to get than alcohol. Prohibition has created a violent criminal market run by international drug cartels. Police waste valuable resources targeting non-violent cannabis consumers, while thousands of violent crimes go unsolved. And there is $14 billion in marijuana sales every year in California, but our debt-ridden state sees none of the revenue that would come from controlling and taxing it. Cannabis prohibition has failed.
The Solution
We need a common sense approach to control and tax cannabis like alcohol.
Proposition 19 was carefully written, in order to:
- Control cannabis like alcohol, allowing adults 21 and over in California to possess up to one ounce of cannabis, to be consumed at home or licensed establishments
- Give state and local governments the ability to tax the sale of cannabis for adult consumption
- Put our police priorities where they belong, by ending the arrests of non-violent cannabis consumers, saving hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars a year and enabling police to focus on violent crime
- Generate billions in annual revenue to fund what matters most in California: jobs, healthcare, public safety, parks, roads, transportation, and more
- Cut off funding to violent drug cartels across our border who currently generate 60 percent of their revenue from the illegal U.S. marijuana market
- Protect our kids, our roads, and our workplaces, by increasing the penalty for selling marijuana to minors, banning the smoking of marijuana in public, on school grounds, and while minors are present, maintaining strict criminal penalties for driving under the influence of marijuana, and preserving employers’ rights to maintain drug-free workplaces
- Protect medical cannabis patients’ rights
Read the Proposition
Title and Summary
Changes California Law to Legalize Marijuana and Allow It to Be Regulated and Taxed. Initiative Statute.
Allows people 21 years old or older to possess, cultivate, or transport marijuana for personal use. Permits local governments to regulate and tax commercial production and sale of marijuana to people 21 years old or older. Prohibits people from possessing marijuana on school grounds, using it in public, smoking it while minors are present, or providing it to anyone under 21 years old. Maintains current prohibitions against driving while impaired. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Savings of up to several tens of millions of dollars annually to state and local governments on the costs of incarcerating and supervising certain marijuana offenders. Unknown but potentially major tax, fee, and benefit assessment revenues to state and local government related to the production and sale of marijuana products.
Section 1: Name
This Act shall be known as the “Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010.”
Section 2: Findings, Intent and Purposes
This Act, adopted by the People of the State of California, makes the following Findings and Statement of Intent and Purpose:
A. Findings
1. California’s laws criminalizing cannabis (marijuana) have failed and need to be reformed. Despite spending decades arresting millions of non-violent cannabis consumers, we have failed to control cannabis or reduce its availability.
2. According to surveys, roughly 100 million Americans (around 1/3 of the country’s population) acknowledge that they have used cannabis, 15 million of those Americans having consumed cannabis in the last month. Cannabis consumption is simply a fact of life for a large percentage of Americans.
3. Despite having some of the strictest cannabis laws in the world, the United States has the largest number of cannabis consumers. The percentage of our citizens who consume cannabis is double that of the percentage of people who consume cannabis in the Netherlands, a country where the selling and adult possession of cannabis is allowed.
4. According to The National Research Council’s recent study of the 11 U.S. states where cannabis is currently decriminalized, there is little apparent relationship between severity of sanctions and the rate of consumption.
5. Cannabis has fewer harmful effects than either alcohol or cigarettes, which are both legal for adult consumption. Cannabis is not physically addictive, does not have long term toxic effects on the body, and does not cause its consumers to become violent.
6. There is an estimated $15 billion in illegal cannabis transactions in California each year. Taxing and regulating cannabis, like we do with alcohol and cigarettes, will generate billions of dollars in annual revenues for California to fund what matters most to Californians: jobs, health care, schools and libraries, roads, and more.
7. California wastes millions of dollars a year targeting, arresting, trying, convicting, and imprisoning non-violent citizens for cannabis related offenses. This money would be better used to combat violent crimes and gangs.
8. The illegality of cannabis enables for the continuation of an out-of-control criminal market, which in turn spawns other illegal and often violent activities. Establishing legal, regulated sales outlets would put dangerous street dealers out of business.
B. Purposes
1. Reform California’s cannabis laws in a way that will benefit our state.
2. Regulate cannabis like we do alcohol: Allow adults to possess and consume small amounts of cannabis.
3. Implement a legal regulatory framework to give California more control over the cultivation, processing, transportation, distribution, and sales of cannabis.
4. Implement a legal regulatory framework to better police and prevent access to and consumption of cannabis by minors in California.
5. Put dangerous, underground street dealers out of business, so their influence in our communities will fade.
6. Provide easier, safer access for patients who need cannabis for medical purposes.
7. Ensure that if a city decides not to tax and regulate the sale of cannabis, that buying and selling cannabis within that city’s limits remain illegal, but that the city’s citizens still have the right to possess and consume small amounts, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.
8. Ensure that if a city decides it does want to tax and regulate the buying and selling of cannabis (to and from adults only), that a strictly controlled legal system is implemented to oversee and regulate cultivation, distribution, and sales, and that the city will have control over how and how much cannabis can be bought and sold, except as permitted under Health and Safety Sections 11362.5 and 11362.7 through 11362.9.
9. Tax and regulate cannabis to generate billions of dollars for our state and local governments to fund what matters most: jobs, healthcare, schools and libraries, parks, roads, transportation, and more.
10. Stop arresting thousands of non-violent cannabis consumers, freeing up police resources and saving millions of dollars each year, which could be used for apprehending truly dangerous criminals and keeping them locked up, and for other essential state needs that lack funding.
11. Allow the Legislature to adopt a statewide regulatory system for a commercial cannabis industry.
12. Make cannabis available for scientific, medical, industrial, and research purposes.
13. Permit California to fulfill the state’s obligations under the United States Constitution to enact laws concerning health, morals, public welfare and safety within the State.
14. Permit the cultivation of small amounts of cannabis for personal consumption.
C. Intent
1. This Act is intended to limit the application and enforcement of state and local laws relating to possession, transportation, cultivation, consumption and sale of cannabis, including but not limited to the following, whether now existing or adopted in the future: Health and Safety Code sections 11014.5 and 11364.5 [relating to drug paraphernalia]; 11054 [relating to cannabis or tetrahydrocannabinols]; 11357 [relating to possession]; 11358 [relating to cultivation]; 11359 [possession for sale]; 11360 [relating to transportation and sales]; 11366 [relating to maintenance of places]; 11366.5 [relating to use of property]; 11370 [relating to punishment]; 11470 [relating to forfeiture]; 11479 [relating to seizure and destruction]; 11703 [relating to definitions regarding illegal substances]; 11705 [actions for use of illegal controlled substance]; Vehicle Code sections 23222 and 40000.15 [relating to possession].
2. This Act is not intended to affect the application or enforcement of the following state laws relating to public health and safety or protection of children and others: Health and Safety Code sections 11357 [relating to possession on school grounds]; 11361 [relating to minors as amended herein]; 11379.6 [relating to chemical production]; 11532 [relating to loitering to commit a crime or acts not authorized by law]; Vehicle Code section 23152 [relating to driving while under the influence]; Penal Code section 272 [relating to contributing to the delinquency of a minor]; nor any law prohibiting use of controlled substances in the workplace or by specific persons whose jobs involve public safety.
Section 3: Lawful Activities
Article 5 of Chapter 5 of Division 10 of the Health and Safety Code, commencing with section 11300 is added to read:
Section 11300: Personal Regulation and Controls
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it is lawful and shall not be a public offense under California law for any person 21 years of age or older to:
(i) Personally possess, process, share, or transport not more than one ounce of cannabis, solely for that individual’s personal consumption, and not for sale.
(ii) Cultivate, on private property by the owner, lawful occupant, or other lawful resident or guest of the private property owner or lawful occupant, cannabis plants for personal consumption only, in an area of not more than twenty-five square feet per private residence or, in the absence of any residence, the parcel. Cultivation on leased or rented property may be subject to approval from the owner of the property. Provided that, nothing in this section shall permit unlawful or unlicensed cultivation of cannabis on any public lands.
(iii) Possess on the premises where grown the living and harvested plants and results of any harvest and processing of plants lawfully cultivated pursuant to section 11300(a)(ii), for personal consumption.
(iv) Possess objects, items, tools, equipment, products and materials associated with activities permitted under this subsection.
(b) “Personal consumption” shall include but is not limited to possession and consumption, in any form, of cannabis in a residence or other non-public place, and shall include licensed premises open to the public authorized to permit on-premises consumption of cannabis by a local government pursuant to section 11301.
(c) “Personal consumption” shall not include, and nothing in this Act shall permit cannabis:
(i) possession for sale regardless of amount, except by a person who is licensed or permitted to do so under the terms of an ordinance adopted pursuant to section 11301;
(ii) consumption in public or in a public place;
(iii) consumption by the operator of any vehicle, boat or aircraft while it is being operated, or that impairs the operator;
(iv) smoking cannabis in any space while minors are present.
Section 11301: Commercial Regulations and Controls
Notwithstanding any other provision of state or local law, a local government may adopt ordinances, regulations, or other acts having the force of law to control, license, regulate, permit or otherwise authorize, with conditions, the following:
(a) cultivation, processing, distribution, the safe and secure transportation, sale and possession for sale of cannabis, but only by persons and in amounts lawfully authorized;
(b) retail sale of not more than one ounce per transaction, in licensed premises, to persons 21 years or older, for personal consumption and not for resale;
(c) appropriate controls on cultivation, transportation, sales, and consumption of cannabis to strictly prohibit access to cannabis by persons under the age of 21;
(d) age limits and controls to ensure that all persons present in, employed by, or in any way involved in the operation of, any such licensed premises are 21 or older;
(e) consumption of cannabis within licensed premises;
(f) safe and secure transportation of cannabis from a licensed premises for cultivation or processing, to a licensed premises for sale or on-premises consumption of cannabis;
(g) prohibit and punish through civil fines or other remedies the possession, sale, possession for sale, cultivation, processing, or transportation of cannabis that was not obtained lawfully from a person pursuant to this section or section 11300;
(h) appropriate controls on licensed premises for sale, cultivation, processing, or sale and on-premises consumption, of cannabis, including limits on zoning and land use, locations, size, hours of operation, occupancy, protection of adjoining and nearby properties and persons from unwanted exposure, advertising, signs and displays, and other controls necessary for protection of the public health and welfare;
(i) appropriate environmental and public health controls to ensure that any licensed premises minimizes any harm to the environment, adjoining and nearby landowners, and persons passing by;
(j) appropriate controls to restrict public displays, or public consumption of cannabis;
(k) appropriate taxes or fees pursuant to section 11302;
(l) such larger amounts as the local authority deems appropriate and proper under local circumstances, than those established under section 11300(a) for personal possession and cultivation, or under this section for commercial cultivation, processing, transportation and sale by persons authorized to do so under this section;
(m) any other appropriate controls necessary for protection of the public health and welfare.
Section 11302: Imposition and Collection of Taxes and Fees
(a) Any ordinance, regulation or other act adopted pursuant to section 11301 may include imposition of appropriate general, special or excise, transfer or transaction taxes, benefit assessments, or fees, on any activity authorized pursuant to such enactment, in order to permit the local government to raise revenue, or to recoup any direct or indirect costs associated with the authorized activity, or the permitting or licensing scheme, including without limitation: administration; applications and issuance of licenses or permits; inspection of licensed premises and other enforcement of ordinances adopted under section 11301, including enforcement against unauthorized activities.
(b) Any licensed premises shall be responsible for paying all federal, state and local taxes, fees, fines, penalties or other financial responsibility imposed on all or similarly situated businesses, facilities or premises, including without limitation income taxes, business taxes, license fees, and property taxes, without regard to or identification of the business or items or services sold.
Section 11303: Seizure
(a) Notwithstanding sections 11470 and 11479 of the Health and Safety Code or any other provision of law, no state or local law enforcement agency or official shall attempt to, threaten to, or in fact seize or destroy any cannabis plant, cannabis seeds or cannabis that is lawfully cultivated, processed, transported, possessed, possessed for sale, sold or used in compliance with this Act or any local government ordinance, law or regulation adopted pursuant to this Act.
Section 11304: Effect of Act and Definitions
(a) This Act shall not be construed to affect, limit or amend any statute that forbids impairment while engaging in dangerous activities such as driving, or that penalizes bringing cannabis to a school enrolling pupils in any grade from kindergarten through 12, inclusive.
(b) Nothing in this Act shall be construed or interpreted to permit interstate or international transportation of cannabis. This Act shall be construed to permit a person to transport cannabis in a safe and secure manner from a licensed premises in one city or county to a licensed premises in another city or county pursuant to any ordinances adopted in such cities or counties, notwithstanding any other state law or the lack of any such ordinance in the intervening cities or counties.
(c) No person shall be punished, fined, discriminated against, or be denied any right or privilege for lawfully engaging in any conduct permitted by this Act or authorized pursuant to Section 11301 of this Act. Provided however, that the existing right of an employer to address consumption that actually impairs job performance by an employee shall not be affected.
(d) Definitions
For purposes of this Act:
(i) “Marijuana” and “cannabis” are interchangeable terms that mean all parts of the plant Genus Cannabis, whether growing or not; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; concentrated cannabis; edible products containing same; and every active compound, manufacture, derivative, or preparation of the plant, or resin.
(ii) “One ounce” means 28.5 grams.
(iii) For purposes of section 11300(a)(ii) “cannabis plant” means all parts of a living Cannabis plant.
(iv) In determining whether an amount of cannabis is or is not in excess of the amounts permitted by this Act, the following shall apply:
(a) only the active amount of the cannabis in an edible cannabis product shall be included;
(b) living and harvested cannabis plants shall be assessed by square footage, not by weight in determining the amounts set forth in section 11300(a);
(c) in a criminal proceeding a person accused of violating a limitation in this Act shall have the right to an affirmative defense that the cannabis was reasonably related to his or her personal consumption.
(v) “residence” means a dwelling or structure, whether permanent or temporary, on private or public property, intended for occupation by a person or persons for residential purposes, and includes that portion of any structure intended for both commercial and residential purposes.
(vi) “local government” means a city, county, or city and county.
(vii) “licensed premises” is any commercial business, facility, building, land or area that has a license, permit or is otherwise authorized to cultivate, process, transport, sell, or permit on-premises consumption, of cannabis pursuant to any ordinance or regulation adopted by a local government pursuant to section 11301, or any subsequently enacted state statute or regulation.
Section 4: Prohibition on Furnishing Marijuana to Minors
Section 11361 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
Prohibition on Furnishing Marijuana to Minors
(a) Every person 18 years of age or over who hires, employs, or uses a minor in transporting, carrying, selling, giving away, preparing for sale, or peddling any marijuana, who unlawfully sells, or offers to sell, any marijuana to a minor, or who furnishes, administers, or gives, or offers to furnish, administer, or give any marijuana to a minor under 14 years of age, or who induces a minor to use marijuana in violation of law shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of three, five, or seven years.
(b) Every person 18 years of age or over who furnishes, administers, or gives, or offers to furnish, administer, or give, any marijuana to a minor 14 years of age or older shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for a period of three, four, or five years.
(c) Every person 21 years of age or over who knowingly furnishes, administers, or gives, or offers to furnish, administer or give, any marijuana to a person aged 18 years or older, but younger than 21 years of age, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of up to six months and be fined up to $1,000 for each offense.
(d) In addition to the penalties above, any person who is licensed, permitted or authorized to perform any act pursuant to Section 11301, who while so licensed, permitted or authorized, negligently furnishes, administers, gives or sells, or offers to furnish, administer, give or sell, any marijuana to any person younger than 21 years of age shall not be permitted to own, operate, be employed by, assist or enter any licensed premises authorized under Section 11301 for a period of one year.
Section 5: Amendment
Pursuant to Article 2, section 10(c) of the California Constitution, this Act may be amended either by a subsequent measure submitted to a vote of the People at a statewide election; or by statute validly passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor, but only to further the purposes of the Act. Such permitted amendments include but are not limited to:
(a) Amendments to the limitations in section 11300, which limitations are minimum thresholds and the Legislature may adopt less restrictive limitations.
(b) Statutes and authorize regulations to further the purposes of the Act to establish a statewide regulatory system for a commercial cannabis industry that addresses some or all of the items referenced in Sections 11301 and 11302.
(c) Laws to authorize the production of hemp or non-active cannabis for horticultural and industrial purposes.
Section 6: Severability
If any provision of this measure or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the measure that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this measure are severable.
Yes on Proposition 19 Ballot Argument
Proposition 19: Common sense control of marijuana
Today, hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars are spent enforcing the failed prohibition of marijuana (also known as “cannabis”).
Currently marijuana is easier for kids to get than alcohol, because dealers don’t require ID.
Prohibition has created a violent criminal market run by international drug cartels.
Police waste millions of taxpayer dollars targeting non-violent marijuana consumers, while thousands of violent crimes go unsolved.
And there is $14 billion in marijuana sales every year in California, but our debt-ridden state gets nothing from it.
Marijuana prohibition has failed.
We need a common sense approach to control and tax marijuana like alcohol.
Proposition 19 was carefully written to get marijuana under control.
Under Proposition 19, only adults 21 and over can possess up to one ounce of marijuana, to be consumed at home or licensed establishments. Medical marijuana patients’ rights are preserved.
If we can control and tax alcohol, we can control and tax marijuana.
Put strict safety controls on marijuana
Proposition 19 maintains strict criminal penalties for driving under the influence, increases penalties for providing marijuana to minors, and bans smoking it in public, on school grounds, and around minors.
Proposition 19 keeps workplaces safe by preserving the right of employers to maintain a drug-free workplace.
Put police priorities where they belong
According to the FBI, in 2008 over 61,000 Californians were arrested for misdemeanor marijuana possession, while 60,000 violent crimes went unsolved. By ending arrests of non-violent marijuana consumers, police will save hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars a year, and be able to focus on the real threat: violent crime.
Police, Sheriffs, and Judges support Proposition 19.
Help fight the drug cartels
Marijuana prohibition has created vicious drug cartels across our border. In 2008 alone, cartels murdered 6,290 civilians in Mexico — more than all U.S. troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined.
60 percent of drug cartel revenue comes from the illegal U.S marijuana market.
By controlling marijuana, Proposition 19 will help cut off funding to the cartels.
Generate billions in revenue to fund what matters
California faces historic deficits, which, if state government doesn’t balance the budget, could lead to higher taxes and fees for the public, and more cuts to vital services. Meanwhile, there is $14 billion in marijuana transactions every year in California, but we see none of the revenue that would come from taxing it.
Proposition 19 enables state and local governments to tax marijuana, so we can preserve vital services.
The State’s tax collector, the Board of Equalization, says taxing marijuana would generate $1.4 billion in annual revenue, which could fund jobs, healthcare, public safety, parks, roads, transportation, and more.
Let’s reform California’s marijuana laws
Outlawing marijuana hasn’t stopped 100 million Americans from trying it. But wecan control it, make it harder for kids to get, weaken the cartels, focus police resources on violent crime, and generate billions in revenue and savings.
We need a common sense approach to control marijuana.
YES on 19.
FAQ’S
Q: What will Proposition 19 do?
A: Proposition 19 offers a common sense approach to control cannabis like alcohol. Under Proposition 19, adults 21 and older will be allowed to possess up to one ounce of cannabis, to be consumed at home or licensed business establishments. Proposition 19 will also give state and local governments the ability to tax the sale of cannabis for adult consumption.
Q: How will Proposition 19 control and tax cannabis?
A: After Proposition 19 passes, adults 21 and over in California can possess up to one ounce of cannabis. Local governments will be able to decide whether to allow for sales within area limits. If a local government decides against allowing for the sale of cannabis within area limits, the possession of up to one ounce of cannabis will still be allowed for those 21 and over within that area, but buying and selling it within area limits will not be allowed. If a local government decides in favor of allowing for the sale of cannabis within area limits, that local community will have control over how cannabis can be sold, how much cannabis can be sold, and what the tax rate will be.
Q: How does cannabis compare to alcohol?
A: Cannabis has much fewer harmful effects than alcohol, which is legal for adult consumption, and taxed to support vital services. Cannabis is not physically addictive, does not have long term toxic effects on the body, has never led to an overdose death, and does not cause its consumers to become violent. If we can control and tax alcohol, we can control and tax cannabis too.
Q: How much revenue will Proposition 19 generate for California?
A: According to California’s tax collector, the Board of Equalization (BOE), there is an estimated $14 billion in cannabis transactions every year in California, but since cannabis remains illegal, our state sees none of the revenue that would come from controlling and taxing it. The BOE estimates that controlling and taxing cannabis could generate $1.4 billion in revenue each year, which could help fund what matters most in California: jobs, healthcare, public safety, parks, roads, transportation, and more. http://www.boe.ca.gov/legdiv/pdf/ab0390-1dw.pdf
Q: How will Proposition 19 create jobs?
A: According to a study by the California Chapter of NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws), controlling and taxing cannabis could generate an additional $12 - $18 billion a year for California’s economy from spin-off industries like coffeehouses and tourism. And if a controlled and taxed cannabis market operated at the same level as the California wine industry, it would create between 60,000 and 110,000 new jobs, and $2.5 - $3.5 billion in new wages for workers each year.
http://canorml.org/background/CA_legalization2.html
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect the number of people who consume cannabis?
A: There is evidence showing that controlling and taxing cannabis does not lead to an increase in consumption. According to The National Research Council’s study of the U.S. states where cannabis is decriminalized, there is little apparent relationship between the cannabis laws in those states and how many people consume cannabis in those states. Also, despite having some of the strictest cannabis laws in the world, the United States has the largest number of cannabis consumers. The percentage of our citizens who consume cannabis is double that of the percentage of people who consume cannabis in the Netherlands, a country where the selling and adult possession of cannabis is allowed. Controlling and taxing cannabis won’t necessarily lead to more people consuming it.
http://www.mpp.org/assets/pdfs/download-materials/MJ_ProhibFacts092008.pdf
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect cannabis use among minors?
A: Right now, cannabis is easier for kids to get than alcohol, because street dealers don’t require ID. By taking cannabis out of the shadows, controlling it like alcohol, and increasing the criminal penalty for providing cannabis to a minor, Proposition 19 will dry up the criminal market, and give California more tools to prevent those under 21 from accessing cannabis.
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect crime?
A: Right now our police waste hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars and thousands of police hours a year arresting non-violent cannabis consumers. According to the FBI, in 2008, over 61,000 Californians were arrested for misdemeanor cannabis possession. That same year, 60,000 violent crimes went unsolved in California. According to a study by Florida State University economists Bruce Benson and David Rasmussen, violent crime increases when police are focused on drug enforcement, particularly cannabis prohibition. They found that every 1% increase in drug arrests leads to a 0.18% increase in violent crimes. When we stop arresting thousands of non-violent cannabis consumers, we will be freeing up police resources and saving hundreds of millions of dollars each year, which could be used for apprehending truly dangerous criminals and keeping them locked up.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_05.html,http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/table_69.html, Benson et al. 2001, “The Impact of Drug Enforcement on Crime: An Investigation of the Opportunity Cost of Police Resources,” Journal of Drug Issues, 31: 989-1006)
Q: How much money will Proposition 19 save law enforcement in California?
A: According to a study by the California Chapter of NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws), controlling and taxing cannabis would save the state over $200 million per year that would have been wasted on arrests, prosecutions, and prison for non-violent cannabis consumers. According to a report by the California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), which provides non-partisan fiscal and policy advice, Proposition 19 would enable California to put our police priorities where they belong. The report says the initiative “could result in savings to the state and local governments by reducing the number of marijuana offenders incarcerated in state prisons and county jails, as well as the number placed under county probation or state parole supervision. These savings could reach several tens of millions of dollars annually. The county jail savings would be offset to the extent that jail beds no longer needed for marijuana offenders were used for other criminals who are now being released early because of a lack of jail space.”http://canorml.org/background/CA_legalization2.html,http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/19_11_2010.pdf
Q: What safety controls does Proposition 19 have?
A: As the California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) report says, under Proposition 19, “the smoking of marijuana in the presence of minors is not permitted.” The initiative would not change laws “that prohibit possessing marijuana on the grounds of elementary, middle, and high schools. Moreover, a person age 21 or older who knowingly gave marijuana to a person age 18 through 20 could be sent to county jail for up to six months and fined up to $1,000 per offense. (The measure does not change existing criminal laws which impose penalties for adults who furnish marijuana to minors under the age of 18.)” http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/19_11_2010.pdf
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect driving laws?
A: Proposition 19 maintains the same strict criminal penalties for driving under the influence of cannabis that exist now. The California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) says that Proposition 19 “would not change existing laws that prohibit driving under the influence of drugs.”http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/19_11_2010.pdf
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect an employer’s ability to maintain a drug-free workplace?
A: Proposition 19 preserves the rights of employers to maintain a drug-free workplace. The California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) says that Proposition 19 “does specify that employers would retain existing rights to address consumption of marijuana that impairs an employee’s job performance.” http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2010/19_11_2010.pdf
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect landlords’ rights?
A: Under Proposition 19, landlords will retain all rights that they have now. Just as landlords can decide whether or not to allow pets or cigarette smoking, after Proposition 19 passes, landlords will also be able to decide whether or not to allow their tenants to possess and consume small amounts of cannabis on the premises.
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect medical cannabis patients?
A: Proposition 19 explicitly protects the rights of medical cannabis patients.
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect the drug cartels?
A: Proposition 19 will help cut off a major source of funding to the drug cartels. Cannabis prohibition has created a violent criminal market run by vicious drug cartels right across our border. In 2008 alone, the cartels murdered 6,290 civilians in Mexico—more than all U.S. troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan combined. According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, in 2006 more than 60 percent of the revenue generated by Mexican drug cartels came from illegal cannabis sales in the United States. It’s time to weaken the cartels and end this senseless violence, by passing Proposition 19, controlling and taxing cannabis, and cutting off a major source of revenue for the cartels.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/02/02/us.mexico.marijuana/index.html?section=cnn_latest
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-02-26-mexico-drug-violence_N.htm
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen
Q: After Proposition 19 passes, how will the new state law interact with federal law?
A: While cannabis will remain illegal federally, we can still pass our own state laws in California. The United States Constitution enables individual states to enact laws concerning health, morals, public welfare, and safety within each state. For instance, in 1996, California voters passed Proposition 215, which legalized medical cannabis in the state, even though it remained illegal federally. Also, 40 counties and cities in California have regulated medical cannabis without federal interference. In addition, under Section 3 of the California Constitution, state and local authorities, who conduct the majority of law enforcement within the state, cannot refuse to enforce a state law “on the basis that federal law or federal regulations prohibit the enforcement.”
Q: Who supports Proposition 19?
A: Proposition 19 is a common sense initiative, and people from all walks of life have come together—many for the first time—to support it. Democrats, Republicans, Independents, Libertarians, Greens, doctors, police chiefs, sheriffs, judges, faith leaders, labor leaders, business leaders, people young and old, are coming together to support Proposition 19’s common sense solution to our failed cannabis laws. For a list of endorsements, click here.
Q: How was Proposition 19 written?
A: Proposition 19 was carefully written by a team of ballot initiative professionals and attorneys in order to get cannabis under control. It contains strict and strong public safety controls on cannabis.
Q: How can I help?
A: This will be a major fight for cannabis reform in California, and we are going to need every supporter involved. Sign up to volunteer, contribute, and get your friends involved today on our website!
Q: Does Proposition 19 change medical cannabis laws in California?
A: No, Proposition 19 will not change or affect current medical cannabis laws or protections offered to qualified patients. Patients will still be able to possess what is needed for medical use, and patients, caregivers and medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives will retain all existing rights under Proposition 215 and SB 420 (codified at California Health & Safety Code 11362.5; 11362.7 - 11362.9). Section 2.B of Proposition 19 expressly lists as one of the initiative’s purposes: “Provide easier, safer access for patients who need cannabis for medical purposes.” Section 2.B also expressly notes that existing medical cannabis statutes will remain the law after passage of Proposition 19. Finally, none of the provisions in Proposition 19 conflict with Proposition 215 or SB 420. As a result, even in the absence of the provisions in Section 2.B of Proposition 19, Proposition 19 could not possibly provide any legal basis for limiting existing medical cannabis law.
Q: If proposition 19 passes, would patients be limited to possessing one ounce or less of cannabis?
A: No, qualified patients will not be subject to the one-ounce quantity limitation for recreational cannabis in Proposition 19. As stated above, patients will retain all of their rights under Proposition 215 and SB 420, including the right to possess any amount of cannabis that is reasonably related to the patient’s current medical needs. Section 3 of Proposition 19 provides in part that “it is lawful and shall not be a public offense under California law for any person 21 years of age or older to” possess one ounce or less of cannabis. Nothing in this provision, or any other provision of Proposition 19, makes it unlawful for qualified patients (including qualified patients under the age of 21) to possess more than one ounce of cannabis.
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect patients who grow medical cannabis? Will patients be limited to cultivating cannabis in an area of not more than twenty-five square feet per private residence?
A: Proposition 19 will not affect patients who grow medical cannabis. Patient gardens will remain legal, and protections will remain unchanged for patients who choose to grow their own medicine. As with all of its provisions, the “twenty-five square feet” provision does not affect or limit the rights of qualified patients under Proposition 215 and SB 420.
Q: How will Proposition 19 affect collective and cooperative cultivation?
A: Proposition 19 will not affect the provision of California law that recognizes medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives (California Health & Safety Code § 11362.775). These collectives and cooperatives will remain lawful throughout the state, regardless of whether or not a locality chooses to control and tax the cultivation and distribution of cannabis for non-medical purposes.
While Proposition 19 does not affect existing medical cannabis law, it will allow for greater protection for collectives and cooperatives in storefront locations. City and county governments that choose to control and tax the cultivation and distribution of cannabis under Proposition 19 will now have the clearly established ability to regulate collective and/or commercial growing.
Q: If Proposition 19 passes, will non-medical patients have the same (or more) rights than patients?
A: No, qualified patients will continue to have all of the rights under Proposition 215 and SB 420 and will therefore have more rights than non-medical cannabis consumers. Adults 21 and over who are not qualified patients will be able to possess up to one ounce of cannabis outside of the home. Adults who are not qualified patients may only grow in a 5’x5’ area, and will have an affirmative defense to possess what they grow for personal use in that area. Patients, caregivers, and/or collectives will still be able to possess and cultivate the amount needed for their medical use and will retain all other rights under Proposition 215 and SB 420.
Q: Will Proposition 19 result in more taxes on medical cannabis?
A: No. Localities already have the ability to tax medical cannabis. In 2008, for example, Oakland voters passed such a tax. Because Proposition 19 will allow localities to control and tax the non-medical cultivation and distribution of cannabis, it is likely to lower the potential tax burden on medical cannabis patients and collectives.
Q: Will Proposition 19 make it more difficult to become a medical patient?
A: No, being a medical cannabis patient will still remain private between you and your doctor.
Q: Will Proposition 19 attract big business and cut out the little guys, and the cottage industry they have worked so hard to create?
A: No. Because cannabis will remain illegal under federal law, interstate corporations (such as tobacco corporations and others) will not be attracted to the cannabis industry. Local groups can work with local governments to help determine regulations and licensing for cultivation and sales. Proposition 19 is also significant in that it gives adults throughout the state the right to personal cultivation of cannabis.
Q: I have heard that, despite the information above and the plain language of the initiative, Proposition 19 will limit the rights of medical cannabis patients. Should I be concerned?
A: Anyone who claims that Proposition 19 will limit or overturn Proposition 215 or SB 420 in any way is either misinformed or misrepresenting the truth. As discussed above, Proposition 19 will not affect any of the legal rights granted to patients, caregivers, doctors, collectives/cooperatives, etc. under California’s existing medical cannabis laws. California’s current medical cannabis laws will remain intact and unchanged by Proposition 19. Nevertheless, a small group of people who benefit financially from the current illegal status of cannabis may be tempted to spread (or to believe) misinformation about Proposition 19 due to self-interest. Unfortunately, some value their personal wealth more than the lives of the over 60,000 Californians who are arrested each year for cannabis offenses and who would no longer be criminalized if Proposition 19 becomes law. The text of Proposition 19 could not be any clearer, however: Proposition 19 will not limit in any way the rights of patients, caregivers, doctors, or collectives/cooperatives.
We are currently facing historic budget deficits in California. Passing Proposition 19 will put our fiscal priorities where they belong, saving California hundreds of millions of dollars each year, and provide California with billions in much needed revenue to fund what matters most.
Revenue
Controlling and Taxing Cannabis Could Generate $1.4 Billion in Revenue Per Year
According to California’s tax regulator, the Board of Equalization (BOE), controlling and taxing cannabis in California could generate $1.4 billion in much needed revenue each year. These funds could go towards jobs, public safety, healthcare, parks, roads, transportation, and more.
A $14 Billion Per Year Illegal Cannabis Market in California
The BOE estimates that there is a $14 billion per year illegal cannabis market in California. But since cannabis remains illegal, our state sees none of the revenue that could have been generated from controlling and taxing it.http://www.boe.ca.gov/legdiv/pdf/ab0390-1dw.pdf
Savings
Over $200 Million in Annual Savings for Public Safety
According to a study by the California chapter of NORML (National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws), controlling and taxing cannabis would save the state over $200 million that would have been spent on arrests, prosecutions, and prison for non-violent cannabis consumers.
$12-18 Billion Generated Annually by Spin-Off Industries
According to the California NORML study, controlling and taxing cannabis could generate an additional $12-18 billion a year for California’s economy from spin-off industries like coffeehouses and tourism.
Thousands of New Jobs and Billions in Wages for Californians
According to the California NORML study, if a controlled and taxed cannabis market operated at the same level as the California wine industry, it would create between 60,000 and 110,000 new jobs, and $2.5 -3.5 billion in wages for workers each year.
http://canorml.org/background/CA_legalization2.html
California wastes hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of police hours per year arresting, prosecuting, and imprisoning non-violent cannabis consumers. Meanwhile, illegal cannabis sales in the U.S. generate the majority of revenue for violent drug cartels across the border. Proposition 19 will enable police to focus resources on violent criminals, and replace a dangerous street market with safe, regulated cannabis sales outlets, putting street dealers and drug cartels out of business.
Drive the Drug Cartels Out of Business
60 Percent of Mexican Drug Cartels’ Revenue Comes from Cannabis Sales in the U.S.
According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, in 2006 more than 60 percent of the revenue generated by Mexican drug cartels came from cannabis sales in the U.S.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/06/AR2009100603847.html
Controlling and Taxing Cannabis will Weaken the Mexican Drug Cartels
Proposition 19 will weaken the power of the Mexican drug cartels. A former Mexican official recently told CNN that he supports legalizing cannabis in the United States and Mexico, in order to stop the cartel killings. In 2008 alone, 6,290 people were murdered by the cartels in Mexico, a number greater than the total amount of American troops killed in both Iraq and Afghanistan combined since 2003.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/02/02/us.mexico.marijuana/index.html?section=cnn_latest
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-02-26-mexico-drug-violence_N.htm
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/fallen/
Put Police Priorities Where They Belong
Every Hour Spent On Cannabis is an Hour Lost on Violent Crime
Every police hour spent on non-violent cannabis consumers is an hour lost that could have been spent on violent criminals. According to a study by Florida State University economists Bruce Benson and David Rasmussen, violent crime increases when police are focused on drug enforcement, particularly cannabis prohibition. They found that every 1% increase in drug arrests leads to a 0.18% increase in violent crimes. (Benson et al. 2001, “The Impact of Drug Enforcement on Crime: An Investigation of the Opportunity Cost of Police Resources,” Journal of Drug Issues, 31: 989-1006)
Put Police Priorities Where They Belong: Save Millions, Keep the Violent Locked Up
The California Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO), which provides nonpartisan fiscal and policy advice, states that Proposition 19 could save “several tens of millions of dollars annually” and permit the “redirection of court and law enforcement resources,” and that “jail beds no longer needed for marijuana offenders” could be “used for other criminals who are now being released early because of a lack of jail space.” http://www.lao.ca.gov/ballot/2009/090512.aspx
California’s Legal System Has its Priorities Wrong
According to the FBI, in 2008, almost 60,000 violent crimes went unsolved in California. That same year, over 61,000 Californians were arrested for misdemeanor cannabis possession.
Register to VOTE
Volunteer!
Our goal is to offer a safe and easy way for you to obtain your Medical Cannabis. Here are just a few of the areas we offer Medical Marijuana delivery to: Riverside County, lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, and all the cities listed in Areas 1, 2, 3. Our delivery of your medcial marijuana will always be on time, reliable and discreet.
Current Medical Cannabis Strains
September 24, 2010 by admin
Filed under Important Information
Due to the feedback we have received from our members,
we have made changes to both our membership plans and cultivation.
We will listen andwork hard to ensure all levels of our business exceed your needs.
MedCare’s Cannabis is all grown indoor
Hydroponically with all of the best nutrients!
We will now be bringing you better Cannabis to meet your needs. Our Marijuana is now all grown indoor hydroponically with the best nutrients available.
Current List of MedCare’s Award Winning Strains:
Blackberry Kush
Tru OG Kush
Bubba Kush
OG Kush
Master Kush
Orange Crush
Candy Purple
Blackberry
DJ Shorts Tru-Blackberry
Tangerine Skunk
Gods Gift
Blue Dream
Grape Punch
Nebula
BubbleGum
Pot of Gold
Larry OG
Call us today to Order a delivery and check availability!
Click Here Log In to Order online
800-420-4369
Our goal is to offer a safe and easy way for you to obtain your Medical Cannabis. Here are just a few of the areas we offer Medical Marijuana delivery to: Riverside County, lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, and all the cities listed in Areas 1, 2, 3. Our delivery of your medical marijuana will always be on time, reliable and discreet.
New and Improved Membership Plans
September 24, 2010 by admin
Filed under Important Information
Due to the feedback we have received from our members, we have made changes to both our membership plans and cultivation. We will listen and work hard to ensure all levels of our business exceed your needs!
It is now easier the EVER to qualify for our cost saving membership plans.
if you know you purchase at least once a month,
and you know how much you typically purchase,
then YOUR QUALIFIED
Call Today to sign up for the only memberships in the industry that save you money!
800-420-4369
Our goal is to offer a safe and easy way for you to obtain your Medical Cannabis. Here are just a few of the areas we offer Medical Marijuana delivery to: Riverside County, lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, and all the cities listed in Areas 1, 2, 3. Our delivery of your medical marijuana will always be on time, reliable and discreet.
California Issues Medical Marijuana Guidelines
September 22, 2010 by admin
Filed under Important Information, Pictures
The Los Angeles Times reported on Aug. 26, 2008 (“California Attorney General Issues Medical Marijuana Guidelines”) that “Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown issued an 11-page directive intended to help legitimate patients avoid arrest while giving police the tools to distinguish legal medical marijuana operations from illegal cultivators and criminal middlemen. He suggested his new ‘road map’ would serve as a shield against the federal government, which has waged war against
the state’s pot rules by conducting raids and mounting court challenges. ‘Hopefully the feds will back off in instances where people are really following these guidelines,’ Brown said Monday in a telephone interview. The guidelines affirm the legality of many of the state’s medical marijuana dispensaries, but only those operated as collectives or cooperatives and not in business for profit.”
According to the Times, “An unlikely coalition of police and medical marijuana activists welcomed the new guidelines, the first substantial directive from a state agency since voters approved Proposition 215 in 1996. ‘As far as I’m concerned, I give this two thumbs up,’ said Kevin Reed of the Green Cross, a collective in San Francisco. ‘If you’re in it for profit, you shouldn’t be in medical cannabis.’ ‘This is huge,’ said Kris Hermes of Americans for Safe Access, a pro-medical marijuana group. ‘Hopefully this will send a message to the federal government that California doesn’t intend to deter from the course it has set.’ The federal government maintains a strict prohibition against marijuana as medicine, and for more than a decade it has made California — which has an estimated 200,000 cannabis-using patients - — the principal beachhead in the battle against medical marijuana. Federal officials at the president’s Office of National Drug Control Policy and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration did not return calls for comment. Police, meanwhile, welcomed Brown’s guidelines, saying they shed light on what had often seemed to them a shadowy world. ‘We have been operating in the dark for many years,’ said Jerry Dyer, Fresno’s chief of police and president of the California Police Chiefs Assn.
The Times noted that “Brown’s guidelines urge patients to apply for state-sanctioned medical marijuana ID cards — and advise police to accept authenticated cards as proof of medical need. Patients are prohibited from using cannabis near schools and recreation centers or at work, unless an employer gives permission. Police, meanwhile, must return seized cannabis to patients who are later proved legitimate. Brown takes a notably hard line on for-profit dispensaries. Scores of storefront operations have sprouted up, often with business owners running virtual emporiums of cannabis. Under the attorney general’s guidelines, they must operate as not-for-profit collectives or cooperatives, and establishments are prohibited from buying marijuana from illegal, commercial growers. Instead, the marijuana must be grown by patients or their caregivers, with fees limited to covering overhead and operating expenses.”
Click Here for the Guidelines
Our goal is to offer a safe and easy way for you to obtain your Medical Cannabis. Here are just a few of the areas we offer Medical Marijuana delivery to: Riverside County, lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, and all the cities listed in Areas 1, 2, 3. Our delivery of your medcial marijuana will always be on time, reliable and discreet.
Lawsuit Against Lake Elsinore
September 20, 2010 by admin
Filed under Important Information
Lawsuit filed against Lake Elsinore seeks to reverse pot dispensary ban
Carlos Stahl, the operator of a former medical marijuana dispensary, R Side Medical, filed a lawsuit after his business license was revoked by Lake Elsinore code enforcement officers who cited the store because Stahl was running a dispensary without a license.
Lake Elsinore municipal codes prohibit the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries, and Stahl’s business license specifically prohibited the sale of medical marijuana at the store. The license only allowed the sale of clothing, apparel and holistic medicine.
Stahl filed the lawsuit in Riverside County Superior Court in May. He is asking a judge to declare as unlawful the city ordinances that prohibit the sale of medical marijuana and to issue a court order barring the city from enforcing the ordinances.
Stahl said in the suit that under state law, he is entitled to operate the medical marijuana collective despite the city ordinances that make them illegal in Lake Elsinore.
In June a judge denied a request for a temporary restraining order barring enforcement of the city’s laws prohibiting medical marijuana sales. Also the City Council upheld the business license revocation, citing language on the license that prohibited the sale of medical marijuana.
A city report to uphold the revocation noted that the term “holistic medicine” appeared vague to the planning official who signed the business license so it was noted on the paperwork that sale of medical marijuana was prohibited.
Council members told Stahl at the time that they are not opposed to the use of medical marijuana by people entitled to do so. But in this case, council members said, the license was revoked because it did not authorize the sale of medical marijuana.
Lawyers for both sides are scheduled in December to meet with the judge to discuss the case.
Our goal is to offer a safe and easy way for you to obtain your Medical Cannabis. Here are just a few of the areas we offer Medical Marijuana delivery to: Riverside County, lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, and all the cities listed in Areas 1, 2, 3. Our delivery of your medcial marijuana will always be on time, reliable and discreet.
Lake Elsinore City Council extends medical marijuana moratorium 10 months
September 19, 2010 by admin
Filed under Important Information, Pictures, Supported Sites
MedCares chance to open a safe access storefront in Lake Elsinore will have to wait close to one year before considering to set-up shop. Lake Elsinore council voted unanimously to extend a 45-day moratorium on marijuana manufacturing activities for an additional 10 months and 15 days.
Lake Elsinore resident Tony Barnes addressed the council and said he too opposes having marijuana available in the city.
“If they want to buy drugs, let them do it another city,” Barnes said. “I know the affects drugs have on kids and adults. What’s going to be legal next?”
Since there are discrepancies in federal and state law regarding the drug, city reports said, ”Staff believes that further study of dispensary regulation is necessary, to help ensure that marijuana manufacturing activities are regulated in a way that protects the community and complies with the applicable law.”
On Monday, medical marijuana backers gathered at the Cultural Center for a town hall
meeting hosted by Wildomar resident Wayne Williams, who heads We The People, a local pro-cannabis organization.

Several guest speakers including doctors and law enforcement spoke in favor of bringing dispensaries to the city Monday, and backers like Williams, said before the council that he was disappointed to not see any Lake Elsinore council members attend the meeting.
I went to great expenses to bring in the speakers to help council understand the issue,” Williams said to the council. “It was disappointing to see that none of you were there.”
Mayor Melissa Melendez said she did advise Williams she would not be attending the Monday town hall meeting due to previous engagements.
“I can assure you Mr. Williams that I am quite educated on the topic, and this decision isn’t an ideology,” Melendez said. “This is about the law and making sure we are going down the right path.
Our goal is to offer a safe and easy way for you to obtain your Medical Cannabis. Here are just a few of the areas we offer Medical Marijuana delivery to: Riverside County, lake Elsinore, Corona, Murrieta, Temecula, and all the cities listed in Areas 1, 2, 3. Our delivery of your medcial marijuana will always be on time, reliable and discreet.
















